Deinfluencing:
What It Actually Changes
Millions of views went to creators telling their audience what NOT to buy — and it didn't kill brand partnerships, it raised the bar for what a credible one looks like. Here's what actually shifted, and how to adapt without abandoning brand deals altogether.
- Deinfluencing is a social media trend, largely originating on TikTok in early 2023, where creators tell audiences what not to buy — a reaction to overconsumption and "haul" culture.
- It doesn't reject brand partnerships outright — it reflects rising audience demand for honesty, including named downsides, not just polished praise.
- A related trend, "underconsumption core," emerged around 2024, focused on reusing and repairing existing items rather than buying new ones.
- Critics have pointed out a real irony: much deinfluencing content still recommends alternative products, meaning it's still a form of influence — worth being aware of, not a reason to dismiss the underlying trust shift.
- The practical takeaway for creators is selectivity and honesty, not necessarily fewer brand deals — audiences reward creators who turn down poor-fit partnerships and disclose clearly.
How to Adapt Without Abandoning Brand Deals
The Honest Tension Worth Knowing About
A fair criticism of deinfluencing, raised repeatedly since it went viral, is that it's still a form of influence — a creator saying "don't buy X, get Y instead" is still shaping a purchase decision, just with different framing. That tension is real and worth sitting with rather than ignoring. It doesn't undercut the core lesson for creators, though: audiences are genuinely more attuned to authenticity signals than they were a few years ago, and content that acknowledges tradeoffs honestly tends to build more durable trust than content that doesn't.
Frequently Asked Questions
What exactly is "deinfluencing"?
It's a social media trend, largely associated with TikTok, where creators actively tell their audience what NOT to buy — pushing back against overconsumption and hype-driven purchasing, often naming specific viral products they don't think are worth it.
When did deinfluencing start?
The trend became widely visible in early 2023, largely in the beauty and lifestyle space, as a reaction to "haul" culture and the volume of influencer-driven product recommendations flooding social feeds.
Is deinfluencing bad for brand deals?
Not inherently — it's better understood as a shift in what audiences expect from sponsored content, not a rejection of brand partnerships altogether. Creators who adapt by being more selective and more honest tend to maintain trust; those who keep operating exactly as before may see more skepticism.
Isn't deinfluencing just influencing with extra steps?
This is a fair, commonly raised criticism — much deinfluencing content still involves recommending alternative (often cheaper) products, meaning it's still a form of influence, just framed differently. Being aware of this tension is useful; it doesn't make the underlying audience desire for more honesty any less real.
What's "underconsumption core" and how does it relate?
It's a related, slightly later trend (gaining visibility around 2024) focused on using, reusing, and repairing existing possessions rather than buying new ones — part of the same broader shift toward anti-haul, minimalism-adjacent content that deinfluencing helped kick off.
Do smaller creators benefit more from this shift than larger ones?
There's a reasonable case for it — nano and micro creators are generally seen as closer to their audience, and audiences tend to notice inauthenticity faster at that scale. That closeness cuts both ways: it's a real trust advantage when the content feels genuine, and a real risk when it doesn't.
Related Articles
Selectivity looks better with a real rate card behind it.
Build a free Identity Kit profile with a media kit, rate card, and creator CV — a clear, professional profile makes it easier to be selective about partnerships without losing credibility.
Create My Free Identity Kit →